| R.B.5 9 A V I E W 2 0 0 8 |
![]() |
1
IM 448199 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008 - JULY, AUGUST
& SEPTEMBER
Last
quarter's graphs seemed half decent, so we'll stick with them:
Figure 3.1 - TV, Radio and Film, week
by week
![]() Figure 3.2 - TV, Radio and Film, day by day ![]() Overall TV Radio Film This
quarter got off to a fairly strong start, week three being the first of
the year to exceed 50pts. This great score was almost entirely due to
film, which clocked up 15pts on 13th July alone (more in a single day
than it achieves in most weeks). Of course, some sort of film
renaissance is to be expected six months into the year: all those 1pt
films shown in January have served their exemption from the chart (see rule 4.06) and can now score again. But in this
case the dramatic surge was down to a specific season: namely the Kubrick run on More4. It was
followed immediately by a selection of Bergmans
on Film4 (some of which are still on the video and have yet to impact
upon the chart). Film remained the dominant force throughout the run,
but radio had a great time of it too. Indeed, the first two weeks saw
radio scoring more points than TV and film, while on 9th August, all
three formats scored an equal 9pts each. There is a reason for radio's
uncharacteristic strength over the three month period, or rather a
number of related reasons: throughout the summer, Radio 5 was busy with
such things as Wimbledon and the Olympics, and this coupled with
presenters holidaying and being replaced by idiots led to me listening
to more Radio 4 than might otherwise be the case, presenting me with a
wide range of eligible programming in a space otherwise occupied by the
longer and exempt news slots or R5. The Olympics also gave me an excuse to
score Five Live Drive under a
technicality. A temporary change in my access to radio during the
summer also assisted the medium. Film scored an overall total of 190.
Radio managed just over half of this on 99. In a dramatic twist of
fortunes, 99 was also the total score for TV. Indeed it is fair to say
that TV has had a pretty dismal run: a score of 150 would normally be
considered low (it scored 152 over these three months last year). But
then this is an Olympic year and I'm no great devotee of the Olympics.
The great archive raiding on B4 this week falls out of the scope of
this review and counts instead towards the October - December run.
Figure 3.3 - Network by network, week
by week
![]() BBC TV ITV TV 4TV 5TV BBC Radio It's
honours pretty much even between BBC and 4TV this run (BBC TV scored
115 to 4TV's 97). That equation can partly be summed up by Kubrick vs The Olympics. BBC Radio is an
oppressive presence on the right of the graph for reasons already
outlined above. ITV has been pretty strong this quarter, and can thank
the Formula 1 for that. As for
C5, it's still living off films alone, but not nearly to the same
degree of success as 4TV.
Figure 3.4 - Digital vs Analogue, week
by week
![]() Digital
Analogue
Every three months we ask the question: is a digibox a worthwhile purchase? This run the answer is clearly yes, certainly as far as July and August are concerned (that's Kubrick again, and the repeats of Christopher Eccleston's Doctor Who on BBC3). In September, however, digital is less wonderful, and BBC2's series of one-off dramas (plus the likes of the F1 and other staples) helps analogue regain its dominance. Figure 3.5 - Analogue channels week by
week
![]() BBC1 BBC2 ITV1 Channel 4 five No surprise to see BBC2 doing most of the hard work for analogue. But a Powell & Pressburger week on C4 at the start of September helps it to a commanding one-off high of 10pts. There's little much to choose between BBC1 and ITV1 while C5 has a pretty dreadful run save a few weeks of films near the end. Figure 3.6 - Network by network, TV
Programmes versus Film, week by week
![]() BBC TV ITV TV 4TV 5TV This eye-bleeding graph demonstrates the weight of film per network on a week for week basis. The higher up from zero, the more TV programming there is; the lower the stalactites, the greater the points-quantity of movie-output. Unsurprising therefore that 4TV should take up the bottom two thirds of the graph, with the BBC dominating the TV aspect. C5 has only one TV item (House), with the rest of its material being filmic. ITV is almost balanced, but only almost. Figure 3.7 - Average performance of
each weekday
![]() Overall TV Radio Film A simple and pleasingly chunky graph that gives us a peek at an average week. Saturday is the best day to stay in, thanks almost entirely to films. Wednesday returns to being the best day for a visit to the pub. Monday offers the best telly while Friday (thanks to Mark Kermode and Simon Mayo) is a day of radio. Figure 3.8 - BBC TV, channel by
channel, week by week
![]() BBC1 BBC2 BBC3 BBC4 Overall As
the only broadcaster with any meaningful internal competition, the BBC
gets its own graph, and here it is. The most noteworthy aberration in
this graph compared with previous incarnations is that massive chunk of
blue in the middle. That's BBC3 of all things. Frighteningly, it towers
over all else, including BBC2. "Has something gone wrong with Ivan's
spreadsheet?" I hear you ask. No, rather it is the concentrated
repetition of the Christopher Eccleston series of Doctor Who broadcast over four
weeks. Wimbledon and the Olympics have a marked effect
on BBC2, which is otherwise fairly healthy. B1 keeps poking up every
now and again, be it with a film or with some other sundry light ents
project. But there's a hole here: a B4 shaped hole. For the first month
of the run B4 functioned ok, but then it just died. It was as if
everyone at BBC4 just went off on holiday, but forgot to raid the
archive for something good to put on while they were away. It was just
a vacuum. A sudden surge of activity in the last week of September
could not save it, because that week (ending as it did in October) is
being carried over to the next run. Three months ago, BBC4 was firmly
in the lead as far as our channel by channel analysis goes. Clearly it
won't be this time, but how far has it fallen? Let's have a look and
see:
So BBC4 falls to joint 10th place. At this time in 2005, B4 came first. In 2006 it was 3rd and in 2007 it was 5th. So every summer, B4 gets progressively worse. As for B3, it may be dramatically high but it is a place shorter than it was last year. The real success story comes with ITV1 whose steady march ever higher continued this run. There they are, above BBC1, Channel 4 and (most shockingly of all) BBC4. That most of their points came from the brum-brums does rather suggest that ITV's renaissance in this chart will be shortlived: Formula 1 returns to the BBC next year. I should really take this opportunity to talk about Ofcom and public service broadcasting, but to be brutally honest I don't think I can be bothered. It's not like I watch much Dales Diary after all. But I will continue to keep an eye on things and report back if I spot anything remotely resembling the end of the world. At the moment, the bigger questionmark hovers over the future of C4 from a PSB perspective, and the details of that have yet to be sorted out. To read Ofcom's proposals and let them know your own thoughts on the matter, use the internet. Parish notices out of the way, let us examine further some of the winners and losers of this run. As pointed out already, Film4 was always going to clock some points up under the six-month rule, so we shouldn't be surprised at all to see it take the lead. As for B2, it makes a welcome return to the top three where it belongs. If this week is anything to go by, BBC4 will not be in the doldrums for long. It's scored more in these last seven days than it did in the whole of the last three months, so a top five placing next time round seems pretty certain. The next in-depth analysis will be in the new year, which is now only three months away. Meanwhile, the Ration Book plods on. I'll see you next week; and just for you I'll keep a little something special aside. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||